IVDM3Seg
  • Overview
  • Tasks
  • Data
  • METHODS
    • SUBMIT
    • DOCKERFILE
    • EXAMPLE: PYTHON
  • RESULTS
    • MICCAI2018
    • __________________
    • lrde
    • ucsf_Claudia
    • wanghuan
    • gaoyunhe_cuhk
    • livia
    • mader
    • changliu
    • smartsoft
    • smartsoftV2
  • Dates
  • Metrics
  • Organizers

Evaluation Metrics

1.Rules for evaluation

​(1) Multi Label Prediction

If the prediction is not binary,  we directly do the evaluation.
Picture

​​(2) Binary Label Prediction

If the prediction is  binary,  we first assign labels to each intervertebral  disc based on ground truth segmentation and then do the evaluation. As shown in the figure below, the complete image space is spitted into 7 sections, corresponding to 7 intervertebral discs in the ground truth segmentation.
Picture
The performance of each submitted method will be evaluated based on both localization and segmentation results.

2. Three Metrics for evaluation

For each test image, the evaluation result would be the average value of 7 intervertebral  discs.  And for each metric, the final evaluation result would be the average value of all test cases.

(1) Dice Overlap Coefficients

The Dice metric measures the percentage of correctly segmented voxels. Dice is computed by
where A is the sets of foreground voxels in the ground-truth data and B is the corresponding sets of foreground voxels in the segmentation result, respectively. Larger Dice metric means better segmentation accuracy.
Picture

(2) Average Absolute Distance

Average Absolute Distance (ASD) is a metric measures the average absolute distance from the ground truth disc surface and the segmented surface. Smaller average absolute distance means better segmentation accuracy.
For each intervertebral disc,  the ASD will be set as maximum value (458.24mm)  if the Dice value is less than 0.1% and additionally the number of segmented voxels assigned to this disc is smaller than 5% of the total voxels of the ground truth segmentation. In such a case, a method is regarded missing the segmentation of the disc completely. ​

(3)  Localization distance

The equation of localization distance R is computed by
Picture
where ∆x is the absolute difference between X axis of the identified IVD center and the ground truth IVD center calcaulated from the ground truth segmentation, ∆y is the absolute difference between Y axis of the identified IVD center and the ground truth IVD center, and ∆Z is the absolute difference between Z axis of the identified IVD center and the ground truth IVD center. Smaller localization distance means better segmentation accuracy.​
For each intervertebral disc, the Localisation distance will be set as maximum value (458.24mm)  if the Dice value is less than 0.1% and additionally the number of segmented voxels assigned to this disc is smaller than 5% of the total voxels of the ground truth segmentation. In such a case, a method is regarded missing the segmentation of the disc completely. ​ ​
Picture
Next
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • Overview
  • Tasks
  • Data
  • METHODS
    • SUBMIT
    • DOCKERFILE
    • EXAMPLE: PYTHON
  • RESULTS
    • MICCAI2018
    • __________________
    • lrde
    • ucsf_Claudia
    • wanghuan
    • gaoyunhe_cuhk
    • livia
    • mader
    • changliu
    • smartsoft
    • smartsoftV2
  • Dates
  • Metrics
  • Organizers